Shakespeare and the Warwick Pageant

Postcard of Queen Elizabeth and the Earl of Sussex, from the Warwick Pageant

Postcard of Queen Elizabeth and the Earl of Sussex, from the Warwick Pageant

I’ve recently listened to an illustrated podcast of a talk given by Professor Michael Dobson in September 2012 at the Shakespeare Institute in Stratford, entitled  A boy from Stratford 1769-1916, freely available on the Backdoor Broadcasting site.

The lecture was mostly about the Warwick Pageant that took place in the grounds of Warwick Castle in July 1906. I knew next to nothing about pageants apart from having read Virginia Woolf’s posthumously published novel Between the Acts, that features a 1939 country pageant staged in the shadow of the gathering clouds and rain of war : “Down it poured like all the people in the world weeping. Tears. Tears. Tears.”.

Virginia Woolf’s pageant deliberately harks back to an earlier time, and pageant-mania had begun decades earlier at the historic town of Sherborne in Dorset in 1905 when playwright Louis N Parker wrote what he originally called a folk play before hitting on the catchier name of a Pageant. To quote F A Mackenzie’s book Wonderful Britain:
The central idea of Mr. Parker’s production was that a pageant is essentially a local affair, presenting the historic life of that locality, as far as possible amidst its own surroundings. The players are local residents who give their services voluntarily and, when they can, make their own uniforms and dresses. Pageants, as Mr. Parker viewed them, were to be held in the open air, without artificial scenery or any of the ordinary accompaniments of a stage. They differed from older displays like the Lord Mayor’s procession in that, in place of being in dumb show, they were presented more ambitiously with music, dialogue and dramatic movement.

Set in the grounds of Sherborne Castle, it set a precedent. Eleven historical scenes were staged, followed by Morris and Maypole dancing, and ended with a final procession of all the participants. It was important that this was a community event, offering “the great incentive to the right kind of patriotism; love of hearth; love of town; love of country; love of England”. Pageants told the “story of England through the idiom of local experience”.  An AHRC-funded project, The Redress of the Past, is currently examining the history of pageants, and its website already includes much interesting material.

An approach for Mr Parker to create something similar for Warwick followed almost immediately. Their pageant was staged in the grounds of Warwick Castle and was on a much larger scale than that in Sherborne. 1500 people took part and the specially-built grandstand was packed with 5000 spectators for each afternoon from 2-7 July 1906.

What, though, did it have to do with Shakespeare?

Pageants became so popular that almost every historic town in the country seems to have had one: York, Scarborough, Dover, Cardiff, Bristol, Stafford, St Albans, all had their own. An inspiring pageant-master was essential, and Frank Benson, organiser of the Stratford Shakespeare Festivals, was in charge of the Romsey Pageant in 1907 and the Winchester Pageant in 1908. In 1927 he directed the spectacularly successful Scots National Pageant in Edinburgh, staged amid the ruins of Craigmillar Castle. Nearly 3000 people took part with 10,000 spectators including the King and Queen.

The boy Shakespeare presented to Queen Elizabeth in the Warwick Pageant

The boy Shakespeare presented to Queen Elizabeth in the Warwick Pageant

Louis N Parker’s script for Warwick included, as Episode 7, a scene lifted from Shakespeare’s play Henry VI Part 3, in which the Earl of Warwick (the Kingmaker), goes to the French court to arrange a dynastic marriage between King Edward and a French Princess, only to be told that Edward has married the English widow Elizabeth Grey.

But the most striking bit of the Warwick Pageant for anyone interested in Shakespeare came in Episode 10, when Queen Elizabeth 1 was entertained at Kenilworth by her favourite the Earl of Leicester. It has long been supposed that Shakespeare, with his father, might have visited Kenilworth to see the festivities, but the Pageant took this idea much further. The Stratford-on-Avon Herald on 6 July 1906 reported that “a charming little incident” was performed during this episode. “The Bailiff of Stratford-on-Avon (Mr G W Everard) is presented [to Queen Elizabeth] and by his side trots a dear little boy of eight summers, clad in green velvet doublet, brown shoes and stockings, white collar and black velvet hat. It is no matter of wonder he strikes the fancy of the queen… he tells her his name is William – William Shakespeare, and fearlessly asks her for a kiss”.

It was a feature of pageants that wherever possible the characters should be played by descendants of those portrayed. And while some people’s names were widely reported, such as Mr Everard, others were anonymous. In particular, William Shakespeare was played by “A boy from Stratford”. Mr Everard turned out to be, if not a descendant of John Shakespeare, a Stratford man, the Managing Director of the Mill, and lived in Avonfield, on Mill Lane (now replaced with a modern house of the same name). Mr Everard was also on the Town Council so was a pretty good match for John Shakespeare.

The boy Shakespeare

The boy Shakespeare

But there was more, as the official guide explained. The pageant ended with the National Anthem “Then, to the strains of solemn music, the march past begins [this was a procession of all the participants in the pageant], and the last figure left on the Arena is that of the little boy William Shakespeare. As he goes out, he kisses his hand to the audience in token that the Pageant is ended”. It must have been a satisfying end to the occasion, even if it had little to do with Warwick itself.

Michael Dobson’s essay ends with the speculation that the anonymous “boy from Stratford” is probably one of the young men whose names are inscribed on the War Memorial in Stratford. He would have been just the age to be sent off to the trenches in World War 1. The identity of the boy was a mystery that I felt needed exploring, and in a week or two I’ll be writing another post to explain what I’ve found out about the little boy who gazes so wistfully out of the photograph.

 

Share
Posted in Legacy, Stratford-upon-Avon | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Thomas Heywood’s women

Engraving based on Isaac Oliver's portrait of Queen Elizabeth

Engraving based on Isaac Oliver’s portrait of Queen Elizabeth

About a week ago I wrote about the extraordinary playwright, poet, prose writer and actor Thomas Heywood whose work is being investigated at the Shakespeare Institute’s Heywood Marathon. This reaches its conclusion on Saturday with Love’s Mistress, Amphrisa, the forsaken shepherdess, and A challenge for beauty. Just from these titles it’s clear that Heywood took a great interest in the virtues and roles of women in society.

Elizabeth 1 was a great inspiration. His play If You Know Not Me, You Know Nobody: A play in two parts, chronicles the Queen’s life and reign only two years after her death.. It was unusual for Heywood’s plays to be printed, but perhaps an exception was made for this popular subject that ended up being reprinted many times.

His enthusiasm for Queen Elizabeth is apparent in his poem celebrating the marriage of Princess Elizabeth in 1613, A marriage triumph. On the nuptialls of the Prince Palatine and the Princess Elizabeth, daughter of James I. 1613. He reminds the Princess of the power of the name Elizabeth:
Could a fairer saint be shrin’d
Worthier to be divin’d?
You equall her in vertues fame
From whom you received your name.
…..
As you enjoy her name,
Likewise possess her fame;
For that alone lives after death,
So shall the name Elizabeth.

In 1631 an anonymous life of Queen Elizabeth, thought to be by Heywood, was published under the title England‘s Elizabeth, her life and troubles, that harks back to “the Greatness, Magnanimity, Constancy, Clemency, and other the incomparable Vertues of our late Queen”.

Sean Bean, Imelda Staunton and Paul Greenwood in the RSC 1986 production of The Fair Maid of the West

Sean Bean, Imelda Staunton and Paul Greenwood in the RSC 1986 production of The Fair Maid of the West

Heywood may never have written a character of the dramatic power of Lady Macbeth, but his women are capable of speaking for themselves and sometimes propel the action of the play in a way that Shakespeare’s women don’t.  One of these is Bess Bridges, the heroine of The Fair Maid of the West, whose name is also inspired by Queen Elizabeth.  Bess begins the play a lowly barmaid in a tavern, wooed by the genteel Spencer who accidentally kills a man in a brawl and flees the country. Her plight superficially resembles Juliet’s in Romeo and Juliet, but Bess refuses to stay at home and mope. After being told (wrongly) of Spencer’s death she captains a ship, setting sail to search for his body and bring it home.

I vividly remember Imelda Staunton’s funny, feisty and touching performance in the production that officially opened the RSC’s Swan Theatre in 1986. Although an adaptation of the original to which several songs were added much of Heywood’s original survived. Bess’s lover seemed to have little to do except look dashing and fight an endless stream of battles (ably done by Sean Bean who was also playing Romeo in the RST), while the plot focused on Bess’s trials and tribulations before the two were eventually reunited.

Heywood’s most extensive consideration of women comes in his major prose work,[Gynaikeion], or Nine Bookes of various History concerninge Women, inscribed by ye names of ye Nine Muses.   I went to look at the original 1624 copy which is held at the Shakespeare Centre Library and Archive. It’s a substantial and impressive volume.

Title page of Heywood's Gynaikeion, 1624

Title page of Heywood’s Gynaikeion, 1624

Its title page sets out the book’s serious intent. The Greek God Apollo is surrounded by the nine classical muses, daughters of Zeus and Mnemosyne. In Greek mythology the muses sang and danced at the festivities of the Olympians, and brought to humanity the purifying power of music, the inspiration of poetry and divine wisdom.

Each of the nine books is under the name of one of the muses, and the book tells stories of women from classical antiquity, including Greek and Roman myths, intended particularly for women to learn from. In his address to the reader, he calls the book “a collection of Histories, which touch the generalitie of women” – some with “Vertues, and Noble Actions”, some Vices”, and by women of “all Estates, Conditions, and qualities whatsoever”.

Heywood was obviously aware that such seriousness might be indigestible, so he constructs the book very much along the lines of a play: “I have…imitated our Historicall and Comicall Poets, that write to the Stage: who lest the Auditorie should be dulled with serious courses… present some Zanie… to breed  in the less capable, mirth and laughter”. So there is light relief among the serious and worthy stories.

Some of these read like tabloid headlines: Of women Contentious, and Bloodie”, “Of Clamorous Women commonly called Scolds”, “Of mothers that have slaine their children, or wives their husbands”. Others illustrate women’s virtues “Of women everie way learned”, Of women poets” and some show that women could step outside their conventional roles within the home: “Of women orators, that have pleaded their own Causes”. A major section is on Witches, concluding that women “are more addicted to this divellish Art than men”.

Heywood’s book was so popular that it was plagiarised. After his death at least two books were published that lifted material straight from these pages without acknowledgement. His championing of women and issues that affect them must have touched a nerve.

Calliope, from the title page of Heywood's Gynaikeion

Calliope, from the title page of Heywood’s Gynaikeion

Here is a full description of the magnificent title page of Gynaikeion:
Above: Apollo – God of Music and the Sun – [with a Lyre and a radiant sun]
The Nine Muses as follows:
Left:
Clio – Muse of History [with her books and a pen, a beetle on the ground in front of her]
Thalia – Muse of Comedy [smiling, with a fool’s distaff]
Terpsechore – Muse of Choral Song and Dance [ holding a lute, with a harp beside her]
Polyhymnia – Muse of Sacred Hymns [In a thoughtful pose, holding the staff entwined     with snakes, traditionally associated with medicine]
Right:
Euterpe- Muse of Lyric Poetry [playing a flute, with a recorder by her side]
Melpomene – Muse of Tragedy [with a scroll, and inkhorn and books]
Erato – Muse of Erotic Poetry [with a globe, mathematical instruments and books at her    feet]
Urania – Muse of Astronomy [a celestial globe on her knee and an astrolabe at her side]Below
Calliope – Muse of Heroic Epic [holding the Latin verse – Aut prodesse solent aut   delectare (“Let them be either of use or delight”) = the same verse as is printed            below the author’s name in the title area of the page

Share
Posted in Legacy, Shakespeare's World | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Thomas Heywood’s women

Kenneth Branagh: from Henry V to Macbeth

Kenneth Branagh as Macbeth. Photo by Johan Persson

Kenneth Branagh as Macbeth. Photo by Johan Persson

Now for a treat: a whole hour of video of Kenneth Branagh, Alex Kingston and Rob Ashford discussing with US journalist Charlie Rose the production of Macbeth which has been playing at the Park Avenue Armoury in New York. The production starred Branagh and Kingston as the Macbeths, while Branagh and Rob Ashford co-directed. Click the link to see the interview.

Originally produced at St Peter’s Church, Manchester as part of the Manchester International Festival in 2013, it has recently transferred for a short season to New York, though if you haven’t seen it already, sadly you’ve now missed the live event.

It gained terrific reviews: the Daily Express described how it packed “a hell of a wallop”, and here is an extract from the New York Times:
An utterly assured and intelligent portrait of a desperate and less-than-brilliant man… this Macbeth is a crowd pleaser in the best sense…The impeccably drilled ensemble members…sustain a headlong pace without sacrificing clarity. Throughout you have the sense not only of events but also entire cycles of history succeeding upon one another rapidly and inexorably…Fast, furious and unstoppable, time keeps rushing forward in this Macbeth, knocking the breath out of everyone, audience included.’ 

While in Manchester it was broadcast live by National Theatre Live and will, I hope, receive some Encore presentations following the success of the New York transfer.

A young Kenneth Branagh as Henry V

A young Kenneth Branagh as Henry V

Kenneth Branagh has probably done more than anyone alive to bring Shakespeare to the mass audience, with films of Henry V, Hamlet and, Much Ado About Nothing among others. His first major success with Shakespeare was the 1984 production of Henry V for the Royal Shakespeare Company in which, aged just 24, he became the youngest person to play the role in Stratford. I’ve just been interviewing Mairi Macdonald, a local archivist and historian, who remembers his performance vividly. Here are some of her memories.

 

Share
Posted in Legacy, Shakespeare on Stage | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Kenneth Branagh: from Henry V to Macbeth

Shakespeare and the UNESCO Memory of the World

documents_images_thumbnails_0_ShakespeareThe good news has been announced that the Shakespeare documents held by the National Archives and the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust have been accepted onto the UNESCO Memory of the World UK register, recognising their national and international significance.  This is how UNESCO describe the documents:

The ‘Shakespeare Documents’ are the key archive sources for understanding the life of the world’s most celebrated poet and playwright, William Shakespeare, b.1564, d.1616.  These unique handwritten documents, dating from within Shakespeare’s lifetime, provide an evidential basis for understanding the narrative of his life.

Shakespeare left a documentary trail of his life, which was divided between his home town, Stratford-upon-Avon, and London. These ‘Shakespeare Documents’ bring together two vital strands of Shakespeare’s life – the enduring influence and draw of home and the excitement and opportunities of Elizabethan and Jacobean London, where his career flourished.

William Shakespeare’s genius endures through his creative works, his characters, stories and language. Understanding the man behind the works has long captured public imagination. The documentary sources are invaluable as they allow us to consider Shakespeare’s personal narrative – his birth, death, family affairs, property and business dealings – as well as his context within a period of history that saw major changes in religious and political society.

The ‘Shakespeare Documents’ are also powerful beyond their evidential value.  They provide a tangible connection to Shakespeare allowing us to get closer to a man who died some 400 years ago yet continues to have an unparalleled influence on language and culture in the UK and beyond.

There are seventy-nine known ‘Shakespeare Documents’. The Shakespeare Birthplace Trust and the UK National Archives have responsibility for caring for the majority of these.

In a press release on 20 June 2014, Clem Brohier, Acting Chief Executive and Keeper of The National Archives made the following announcement:
‘We are extremely pleased that the Shakespeare documents held here at Kew have been awarded this international recognition. It is testament to their importance not only to the UK but to the wider literary and cultural world…

The significance of the ‘Shakespeare documents’ relates directly to William Shakespeare’s unrivalled literary achievements, his status as England’s national poet and the global cultural impact of his work… All the nominated documents are handwritten sources, two of which we hold have Shakespeare’s signature on them. This, combined with their historic and cultural significance, underlines their irreplaceability.

There will be an opportunity for the public to see some of them in 2016 when The National Archives stages a programme of events to mark the 400th anniversary of the playwright’s death, and Professor Grace Ioppolo notes, in her post written for the National Archives blog on 23 April 2014, that in 2016 a consortium of US and UK libraries and archives will contribute to a travelling exhibition of manuscripts and books associated with Shakespeare’s life and career. Some of the handwritten documents that have been recognised by UNESCO will be among them, and will allow people to see them “in the flesh”, helping to fulfil the aim of the register to broaden access to the collections.

For more information here’s a link to Professor Grace Ioppolo’s post, which is one of several entries on the blog that relates to Shakespeare.

Both the National Archives and the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust have published well-researched books about the Shakespeare documents they hold. In 1985 D Thomas published Shakespeare in the Public Records detailing the 35 records held by the National Archives, and in 1994 Robert Bearman, the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust’s Senior Archivist, did the same thing with Shakespeare in the Stratford Records for the 31 records held in Stratford. Photographs of the documents are included, as well as a full analysis describing how and why they were written and what they tell us about the times in which Shakespeare lived.

A page from Shakespeare's Will

A page from Shakespeare’s Will

The Stratford documents include the famous Quiney letter, and the parish registers that contain multiple references to the baptism, marriage and burial records of members of Shakespeare’s family. The London records include Shakespeare’s Will, the document ordering ‘scarlet red cloth’ to Shakespeare and his colleagues for the royal entry of James I into London in 1604, another listing plays performed at court of which some were by ‘Shaxberd’, and, showing his human side, a list of tax defaulters that names Shakespeare among, it has to be said, many others.

Given that the aim of the UNESCO award is to help raise the profile of collections, and to make them easier to access, wouldn’t it be a great project for The National Archives and the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust to make high-quality digitised versions of these documents available online together with the scholarly articles from these books which do so much to explain their significance? All the work has already been done (though full transcripts would add much to the usefulness of the images).

If you’re not familiar with the UNESCO project, the UK register is a country-level programme that complements the international register begun in 1992 with the aim of ensuring that the world’s documentary heritage is protected and preserved for all. The UK register already lists 41 collections including Hereford’s Mappa Mundi. Items on the international register include Eleanor Roosevelt’s papers, Georgian Byzantine Manuscripts, documents relating to Roald Amundsen’s South Pole Expedition, and Egypt’s Mamluk Qur’an Manuscripts. It’s an extraordinary list covering documents representing ancient and modern cultural achievements and developments in social, political and medical history. The UNESCO site lists all the collections being added to the UK register, and describes the significance of the documents.

Share
Posted in Legacy, Shakespeare's World, Stratford-upon-Avon | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Remembering Buzz Goodbody at The Other Place

The Other Place at the Courtyard Theatre

The Other Place at the Courtyard Theatre

This week the Royal Shakespeare Company has been celebrating the opening of what is being called The Other Place at the Courtyard Theatre, a temporary re-imagining of the studio theatre which was once called “the most productive tin hut in history”. Midsummer Mischief is a month-long festival until 12 July of four new plays in two programmes. On Tuesday evening, before the shows, guests who had connections with the little theatre were invited to “Raise a Glass for Buzz” to celebrate the achievement of Buzz Goodbody, the inspirational first artistic director of The Other Place.

Launched in 1974, the theatre was based on using existing resources: actors already in the main theatre season, costumes from the stores, a suitable building. To quote Sally Beauman in her book The Royal Shakespeare Company, “there was a vigour, freedom, and vitality about The Other Place work that first season notably lacking in the new large-theatre productions”. This was largely put down to Buzz Goodbody’s leadership, and it was not surprising that a further season was planned in 1975. But just a few days after the first performance of her production of Hamlet, Buzz Goodbody took an overdose. Her suicide could have been the end of The Other Place, depending as it had on her commitment and ambition. The company was traumatised by her death, but the RSC’s Artistic Director Trevor Nunn stepped in to ensure the work of TOP continued. The reviews of Goodbody’s Hamlet were enthusiastic, and the press were suddenly interested in TOP. In 1975 Nunn directed a studio version of Macbeth, with Ian McKellen and Judi Dench, two leading Shakespearean actors, in the leading roles. It became the most famous production ever staged at TOP and has gone down as one of the greatest productions of the play. The theatre’s renown was assured, but Buzz Goodbody, the founder of the theatre, received much less attention. The RSC, and Deputy Artistic Director Erica Whyman in particular, is putting this right with the current festival, and with an exhibition in the foyer of the Courtyard Theatre.

Buzz Goodbody

Buzz Goodbody

While it’s excellent to see so much attention finally being given to Buzz Goodbody, some journalists have been a little over-enthusiastic. Readers of Andrew Dickson’s Guardian piece might assume that Goodbody had all but invented Theatregoround, the RSC’s small-scale touring enterprise that visited schools and other unusual venues. In fact Terry Hands was employed from about 1966 specifically to set it up. Similarly the corrugated iron hut renamed The Other Place by Goodbody had in fact been there as a rehearsal space and HQ for Theatregoround since the mid-sixties. Under the name The Studio it had even been used as a performance space in 1973 with three successful small-scale shows (not directed by Goodbody). So Goodbody’s manifesto for The Other Place, written at the end of 1973, built on the success of work that had already been begun.

What Goodbody did bring was what Rupert Christiansen calls her “flamboyant personality and radical politics”. Her seven-page manifesto for TOP bubbles with ideas and enthusiasm. Sally Beauman explains: “The document…reflected the breadth of her commitments, and her concern that the RSC should extend not just its methods of working and its repertoire, but also its audiences, choosing some plays of local relevance, mounting Shakespeare plays that were on local school syllabuses, and keeping seat prices low”.

Goodbody was both a Communist and a feminist, and as the first female director for the RSC (though not the first woman to direct at the Shakespeare Memorial/Royal Shakespeare Theatre), she was a breath of fresh air in the masculine world of the Company. Again in Rupert Christiansen’s piece, he quotes Erica Whyman on her hopes for the Other Place at the Courtyard: “I don’t want a walled-up feminist enclave…but I hope we can redress a certain male bias in the RSC, running a dialogue with the company’s larger-scale work”.

Here’s a YouTube clip of Erica Whyman talking about her plans for The Other Place.

After raising our glasses to Buzz, we went into the temporary auditorium, the single bank of seats  reminiscent of the seating configuration for Steven Pimlott’s terrific production of Richard II in 2000. All four plays are intended to reflect on the quote by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich, “Well behaved women seldom make history”, and on Tuesday we watched Programme B, consisting of I Can Hear You by E V Crowe and This is Not an Exit by Abi Zakarian. Both plays examine the dilemmas facing women today. I loved the moment in the second play in which Mimi Ndiweni bursts onto the stage, full of anarchic energy, challenging the uncertainties of the middle-class Ruth Gemmell. I hope that Buzz would have approved.

The Other Place, 1978

The Other Place, 1978

Buzz Goodbody’s TOP remained in place until 1989, when it was rebuilt in more permanent form and re-opened in 1991. This theatre then became the foyer to the Courtyard Theatre when it was constructed in order to house the RSC during the rebuilding of its main house. More information about the aim to built a new permanent Other Place in the Courtyard Theatre can be found here.

And following the theme of women and mischief, on Saturday 28 June the RSC is presenting a full day of Making Mischief – a day of conversations and events at The Other Place at the Courtyard Theatre.

Share
Posted in Legacy, Shakespeare on Stage, Stratford-upon-Avon | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Remembering Buzz Goodbody at The Other Place

Great Shakespeare performances: David Garrick’s Richard III

Hogarth's painting of Garrick as Richard III

Hogarth’s painting of Garrick as Richard III

Few dates in the history of Shakespeare on stage are as significant at 19 October 1741. Then the young David Garrick (billed as “A gentlemen who never appeared on any stage”) performed the part of Richard III at Goodman’s Fields in London. The importance of this appearance was immediately recognised.

Arthur Murphy, writing six decades later in 1801, commented that he made “on the very first night, a deep impression on the audience. His fame ran through the metropolis. The public went in crowds to see a young performer, who came forth at once a complete master of his art”. Alexander Pope wrote “Garrick never had his equal, and never will have a rival”.

Richard III became one of Garrick’s most famous roles. The text he used was the adaptation by Colley Cibber, who had performed in the role from 1700-1739. Later Garrick made his own adaptations, but always based on Cibber, and his versions were even shorter than Cibber’s, which was in its turn very much shorter than Shakespeare’s. Garrick apparently based his interpretation on Richard’s lines from Act 5 Scene 6 of Henry VI Part 3 “I that have neither pity, love, nor fear”.

Garrick was particularly praised in the wooing of Lady Anne, the scene in his tent before the battle of Bosworth, and the battle scene of Richard’s death. Garrick continued to play Richard III throughout his long career and was painted in the role several times. I’m looking at two of the most famous, one from his early years, and one from the last years of his acting career. Neither painting shows Garrick in the early part of the play where Richard is at his most manipulative and evil. Hogarth painted his renowned portrait of Garrick in the Tent scene not long after that first performance. This is now one of the most famous paintings of Shakespeare on stage, and can now be seen in the Walker Gallery, Liverpool. Thomas Wilkes, writing in 1759, described him at just the same moment: “There is a fine contrast in the tent scene of the last Act, between the calm soliloquy spoken by Richard before he retires to his couch and the horror with which he starts up and comes forward after the ghosts have uttered their predications… I do not recollect any situation in Tragedy in which he appears to more advantage than that in which he rises and grasps his sword before quite awake”.

Nathaniel Dance-Holland's painting of David Garrick as Richard III

Nathaniel Dance-Holland’s painting of David Garrick as Richard III

Another painting of Garrick in the role, painted by Nathaniel Dance-Holland in 1771, shows Richard, unhorsed on the battlefield of Bosworth Field, waving his sword. It’s the moment when he shouts in desperation ” A horse, a horse, my Kingdom for a horse”.  Garrick was particularly fine when depicting Richard towards the end of the play when “All was rage, fury, and almost reality.”

Unlike the elegantly-dressed but haunted figure in the Hogarth painting, this one shows a dishevelled Richard, still defiant but with an air of desperation. It captures the uncertainty of the character: early on it was a “fiery depiction of … a malicious murderer” , but according to Davies in 1808, the audience “were especially charmed when the actor, having thrown aside the hypocrite and politician, assumed the warrior and the hero”. It is reported that “the death of Richard was accompanied with the loudest gratulations of applause”. It now hangs in the Town Hall of Stratford-upon-Avon.

Garrick appealed directly to his audiences. His performing style “banished ranting, bombast, and grimace; and restored nature, ease, simplicity, and genuine humour”. As Richard, he found the complexity of the character. While deceptive and wicked, “wherever he speaks of his own imperfections, he shews himself galled and uneasy”.

From Weds 25-Fri 27 June 2014 at The Rose Theatre in Kingston-upon-Thames a conference is being held on Garrick and Shakespeare, jointly hosted by Kingston University and the Rose Theatre. While Garrick is best remembered as an actor, he was also a theatre manager, playwright and poet. The notes for the conference suggest that he was “possibly both the most praised and vilified cultural celebrity of his generation. Authors whose plays he rejected and performers he did not employ were not sparing in their attacks”. This conference aims to focus on his achievements in Shakespeare, and to re-examine his controversial reputation.

Speakers will include Michael Dobson, Norma Clarke and Peter Holland.  It will include a lecture by actor Simon Callow, a trip to Garrick’s Temple in Hampton, a performance by the Hampton Players of The Celebrated Mr Garrick and the British premier screening of Simon Callow’s new film Miss in her Teens, based on David Garrick’s 1747 play of the same name.

Share
Posted in Shakespeare on Stage | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Great Shakespeare performances: David Garrick’s Richard III

Reading Thomas Heywood

The Shakespeare Institute, Stratford-upon-Avon

The Shakespeare Institute, Stratford-upon-Avon

Down at the Shakespeare Institute in Stratford-upon-Avon the students are holding another marathon playreading. In 2013 it was Beaumont and Fletcher, with a tally of 53 plays and 1 masque. This year, between 9 and 28 June they are taking on Thomas Heywood, and over these twenty days they are reading 37 plays. The Beaumont and Fletcher Marathon aimed to encourage discussion about the disputed dating of some of their plays: with Heywood the challenge is to look at “the authorship of some of the plays traditionally attributed to Heywood, but whose authorship is still disputed”. It’s no wonder that Heywood has been suggested at the author of unattributed plays. In his preface to The English Traveller in 1633 he claimed to have had “an entire hand or at least a main finger in two hundred and twenty plays”.  With fewer than twenty plays being printed under his name during his lifetime there was plenty of scope for speculation. Perhaps fortunately for the Shakespeare Institute students most of the 220 plays that Heywood contributed to, like so many of those performed on the early modern stage, are lost.

Also in The English Traveller he wrote “It never was any great ambition in me, to be in this kind voluminously read”, preferring instead to have his plays performed in the theatre. When he did approve publication of one of his plays he stressed it was with the consent of Queen Anne’s Men. The copyright in a play, in so far as this existed, belonged to the company, not the writer.

Title page for The Fair Maid of the West

Title page for The Fair Maid of the West

Heywood is something of a mysterious figure, born around 1574 in Lincolnshire and probably be the son of Robert Heywood, a rector. It is believed that he attended the University of Cambridge but left without a degree, possibly because of the death of his father. Maybe there is a parallel with Shakespeare whose education is thought to have been cut short because of his father’s financial problems. Like Shakespeare, Heywood’s first published work was a long poem, Oenone and Paris, and it’s thought that in the same year, 1594, he wrote his first play for the theatre, The Four Prentices of London. This popular romance was mocked in Beaumont’s The Knight of the Burning Pestle. Although he excelled in writing about domestic subjects he also wrote a sequence of five plays on Greek mythology. Beginning with The Golden Age, he went on through The Silver Age and The Brazen Age, finishing with The Iron Age which told the story of the Trojan War in two parts. Again like Shakespeare Heywood combined writing for the stage with acting. He became an actor-sharer in Worcester’s Men for whom he wrote from about 1599 to 1614, and without doubt his acting gave him, as it did Shakespeare, a feel for what audiences enjoyed. His plays are full of incident, romance and broad humour, though he also wrote chronicles and tragedy. His best-known plays are the comedy The Fair Maid of the West and the serious drama A Woman Killed With Kindness.

Heywood wrote much apart from those 220 plays. He created seven pageants for the Lord Mayor of London celebrating mercantile values. Although Heywood cared little for the future of his plays, the same was not true of the non-dramatic works, on which he spent more and more time towards the end of his long career (he died in 1641). These included the poems The Life and Death of Queen Elizabeth and Troia Britannica.

Title page of An Apology for Actors

Title page of An Apology for Actors

The prose work for which he is best remembered, though, was An Apology for Actors, written in 1612. This stoutly defended actors from the charges of lewd and disorderly behaviour made against them by Puritans and others. What he says applies to Shakespeare, John Heminges, Henry Condell, Edward Alleyn and others:
Many amongst us I know to be of substance, of government, of sober lives and temperate carriages, housekeepers, and contributory to all duties enjoined them equally with them that are ranked with the most bountiful. 

As a writer himself, he also suggests that players have been instrumental in improving the language:
Our English tongue, which hath been the most harsh, uneven and broken language of the world, part Dutch, part Irish, Saxon, Scotch, Welsh, and indeed a gallimaufry of many, but perfect in none, is now, by this secondary means of playing, continually refined, every writer striving in himself to add a new flourish unto it; so that in process, from the most rude and unpolished tongue, it is grown to a most perfect and composed language. *

Shakespeare contributed more new flourishes to the language than most, and in the 1635 The Hierarchy of the Blessed Angels, Heywood affectionately remembers Shakespeare the writer:
Mellifluous Shakespeare, whose enchanting Quill
Commanded Mirth or Passion, was but “Will”.

The playreading is taking place under the guidance of Dr Martin Wiggins and the full timetable for the playreading is given on the website. Auditors are most welcome, and as the text is projected on a screen it’s easy to follow as it is read out. Most importantly, the reading is raising funds for the Lizz Ketterer Trust which gives a US student the chance to experience full immersion in Shakespeare at Stratford as well as providing research bursaries for Shakespeare Institute students. If you’d like to donate details are on the website. 

*I’m indebted for the quotations from The Apology for Actors to Stanley Wells’ book Shakespeare & Co.

Share
Posted in Legacy, Shakespeare's World, Stratford-upon-Avon | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Reading Thomas Heywood

Shakespeare for children: Charles and Mary Lamb

Mary and Charles Lamb by Francis Stephen Cary

Mary and Charles Lamb by Francis Stephen Cary

In a recent survey of childrens’ favourite books A A Milne’s much-loved Winnie the Pooh, written in 1926 came top. Second, perhaps more surprisingly, came the even older and quirkier Alice in Wonderland, published in 1865. Given that most of these surveys tend to favour recent books or films, I was surprised to find no Harry Potter on the list, but then noticed the survey only asked adults!  In fact no book published since 2000 came anywhere in the top 10. It was published with the serious purpose of helping to promote childrens’ reading and adults reading to children, a project with the backing of Barnardos and John Lewis.

The survey also limited it self to the last 150 years. Even if it hadn’t, I doubt if Charles and Mary Lamb’s Tales from Shakespeare would have made it onto the list, but this book must have introduced hundreds of thousands of children to Shakespeare’s plays in the 200 or so years since it first appeared.

Brother and sister Charles and Mary Lamb first published their book in 1807. It consisted of stories based on just twenty plays. Mary took on the comedies and romances: The Tempest, The Winter’s Tale, Twelfth Night, As You Like It, All’s Well That Ends Well, Measure for Measure, Twelfth Night, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Cymbeline, The Merchant of Venice, The Two Gentlemen of Verona, Much Ado About Nothing, The Comedy of Errors, Pericles. Charles wrote the tragedies: King Lear, Hamlet, Timon of Athens, Romeo and Juliet, Othello, Macbeth.

The aim was to reduced the complications of the stories and to make them easier to understand. In the joint preface they explained their aim of introducing Shakespeare’s language to children: “his words are used whenever it seemed possible to bring them in; and in whatever has been added to give them the regular form of a connected story, diligent care has been taken to select such words as might least interrupt the effect of the beautiful English tongue in which he wrote: therefore, words introduced into our language since his time have been as far as possible avoided.”

Harold Copping's illustration of Romeo and Juliet

Harold Copping’s illustration of Romeo and Juliet

The Tales have been illustrated by many distinguished artists including Arthur Rackham. My own copy of the book probably dates back to the 1880s, and shows many signs of being well-read, with most of the prefatory materials missing and the covers held on by ancient sticky tape. The illustrations are by the artist William Harvey (1796-1866) who contributed work to Knight’s Illustrated edition of Shakespeare first published in 1839.

My favourite illustrations to Lamb’s Tales from Shakespeare are those by Harold Copping (1863-1932) which feature in a 1901 edition. His style was very different from the prim but also melodramatic images by Harvey. I particularly like the Romeo and Juliet illustration in which the artist succeeds in conveying Juliet’s awakening sexuality, unlike Harvey’s image of the same scene where Juliet, hiding her face, drapes her arms chastely around Romeo’s neck.

Harvey's illustration for Romeo and Juliet

Harvey’s illustration for Romeo and Juliet

Harvey’s image, though, might be thought closer to how Charles Lamb describes this scene:
That night Romeo passed with his dear wife, gaining secret admission to her chamber, from the orchard in which he had heard her confession of love the night before. That had been a night of unmixed joy and rapture; but the pleasures of this night, and the delight which these lovers took in each other’s society, were sadly allayed with the prospect of parting, and the fatal adventures of the past day. The unwelcome daybreak seemed to come too soon, and when Juliet heard the morning song of the lark, she would fain have persuaded herself that it was the nightingale, which sings by night; but it was too truly the lark which sung, and a discordant and unpleasing note it seemed to her; and the streaks of day in the east too certainly pointed out that it was time for these lovers to part.

Many of Copping’s pictures were sold as postcards, and this site contains several of his illustrations to Lamb, as well as some coloured images of Hamlet.

Illustrations interpret the words of the play as much as the written narrative. In a recent post on the British Shakespeare Association’s Education blog, student Anna Henley writes about the paradox that retelling the story in student editions  can limit understanding of the play at the same time as they attempt to explain it:
Classroom experience from Bruce Coville and Alison Prindle among others … has shown that narrative forms… are a fantastic entry point for students despite the narrowing of interpretation that may accompany this approach. For instance, Bruce Coville writes, “it is stories that children long for, and it is story that is the entry point for many people to the pleasures of Shakespeare” .*

The Lambs felt it was right for them to rework plots: Charles Lamb actually included a justification for missing out most of the Gloucester subplot from King Lear. Young readers were presented with certainties and moral precepts. Of the end of the play he wrote “the melancholy fate of the young and virtuous daughter, the lady Cordelia, whose good deeds did seem to deserve a more fortunate conclusion; but it is an awful truth, that innocence and piety are not always successful in this world”.

*Coville, Bruce. “Nutshells of Infinite Space: Stages of Adaptation”. Reimagining Shakespeare for Children and Young Adults. Ed. Naomi Miller. Oxon: Routledge, 2003

Share
Posted in Legacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Shakespeare for children: Charles and Mary Lamb

Shakespeare and the alchemists

An astrologer at work

An astrologer at work

I’ve recently been investigating a website that allows us to get a close look at the medical world of Elizabethan and Jacobean England. The Casebooks Project “aims to make available the astrological records of Simon Forman and Richard Napier — unparalleled resources in the history of early modern medicine. Our database of transcriptions, browsable and searchable, brings together the details of the thousands of clients who consulted these men and the questions they asked. It allows sophisticated interrogation and easy perusal of a manuscript archive famed as much for its difficulty as its riches.” I wrote a post about Simon Forman including information about this project back in 2011. Things have now moved on.

Richard Napier

Richard Napier

Between 1596 and 1634 these two astrologers recorded about 80,000 consultations, and the casebooks are some of the fullest surviving historical medical records. The bulk of the consultations, about 70,000 of them, are by Napier from his practice in Buckinghamshire. Not only do they give an indication of the kind of treatment patients were offered, they show the kind of ailments and worries that people four centuries ago experienced. Each consultation is transcribed and searchable, making this a fantastic resource. As well as the transcriptions themselves there is a description of how the consultations were carried, a guide to astrology and information about both the astrologers. The casebooks of both men are now in the Bodleian Library, Oxford where they fill 64 volumes. When you consider the difficulty of reading the pages, this is an astonishing work of scholarship. I know it’s churlish of me to complain, but the website is quite tricky to navigate so if you do want to try it out you may have to  persevere!

A page from Forman's casebook

A page from Forman’s casebook

Here are a few examples of the cases the two men reported:
On 28 February 1599 Mary Travell of Gothurst, aged 20, consulted Napier, sick at heart because 2-3 years after her marriage she “cannot goe no children”.

On 27 May 1601 Nicholas Knight of Lambeth consulted Forman, concerned that Alice Baker of Lambeth or Alice Soot of Streatham “have bewitched his cattell”.

On 24 June 1601, Elizabeth Brown, aged 60, consulted Forman to ask whether “ther be any evil don against he for that she prospereth not. And wy the Crowes doe follow her”.

Simon Forman

Simon Forman

Shakespeare-lovers will be familiar with the name Simon Forman because as well as recording his medical work he also wrote accounts of visits to the theatre. The most famous of these accounts is his 1610 description of Macbeth,  a play which included many of his interests in particular the supernatural, and the connection between character and health. His report focuses on the prophecies, the reported disturbances in the weather during the night of the murder of Duncan, and includes the note “Observe also how Macbeth’s queen did rise in the night in her sleep, and walked and talked and confessed all, and the doctor noted her words”.

The Casebook project provides both information about the world of the two astronomers and an amazing level of detail. At the other end of the scale I’ve been enjoying Dan Falk’s breezy book The Science of Shakespeare that surveys many different aspects of science in Shakespeare’s time. The blurb for the book declares:
William Shakespeare lived at a remarkable time—a period we now recognize as the first phase of the Scientific Revolution. New ideas were transforming Western thought, the medieval was giving way to the modern, and the work of a few key figures hinted at the brave new world to come: The methodical and rational Galileo, the skeptical Montaigne, and—as Falk convincingly argues—Shakespeare, who observed human nature just as intently as the astronomers who studied the night sky.

Falk certainly knows his Shakespeare, and his arguments range widely. He can get a bit stuck on favourite theories, but he covers a great deal of ground almost effortlessly. Our astrologers Simon Forman and Richard Napier don’t get a mention but he does note that astrology was seen as so important that “in 1599 Shakespeare’s company consulted an astrologer to decide on the best day to open the Globe Theatre.” In his plays Shakespeare doesn’t come down on either side: on the one hand those who believe in astrology, like Gloucester in King Lear, are sometimes seen as gullible, easily tricked by his evil son Edmund. But in Macbeth, as well as the rough night when Duncan is murdered, worse follows:
Thou seest, the heavens, as troubled with man’s act,
Threaten his bloody stage: by the clock, ’tis day,
And yet dark night strangles the travelling lamp

Julius Caesar famously ignores the warnings of the Soothsayer and of the sacrifice made on the Ides of March. It’s described again in Hamlet:
In the most high and palmy state of Rome,
A little ere the mightiest Julius fell,
The graves stood tenantless, and the sheeted dead
Did squeak and gibber in the Roman streets;
As stars with trains of fire, and dews of blood,
Disasters in the sun; and the moist star
Upon whose influence Neptune’s empire stands
Was sick almost to doomsday with eclipse.

The 80,000 consultations given by Forman and Napier are certainly pretty convincing evidence that the Elizabethans and Jacobeans believed in astrology, and Shakespeare offers examples that would have convinced them they were right to do so.

Share
Posted in Shakespeare's World | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Shakespeare’s vision of apocalypse: King Lear at the National Theatre

beale lear2As I write this on the afternoon of 6 June the celebrations for the 70th anniversary of the D-Day landings in Normandy are taking place. President Hollande, speaking into a microphone, has been talking about peace in Europe, in front of an audience of servicemen, veterans and heads of state. Stretched out on the beach in front of him is a vast map of Europe, the same beach onto which Allied troops fought their way exactly 70 years ago. Some of the politicians, behind the polite handshakes, are very much at odds. Earlier the TV coverage split the screen to show the images of President Obama and Vladimir Putin simultaneously reacting to what was happening.

Just two days ago I was at a performance of King Lear at the National Theatre, where Simon Russell Beale as Lear spoke into a microphone about his wish “that future strife may be prevented now”, in front of an audience of servicemen and heads of state. The three maps neatly dividing the kingdom lay in their official black folders.

Two days before that, on Monday, King Juan Carlos of Spain announced he was to abdicate in favour of his son, Crown Prince Felipe. King Juan Carlos has led his country from dictatorship to democracy. But his announcement, designed to allow for a smooth transfer of power, has led to calls for a referendum on the monarchy itself.

Ongoing civil war in Syria, turmoil in the Ukraine, arguments about the European Union: can parallels between political events and Shakespeare’s play ever have been more striking? I’ve seen many productions of King Lear but have never before been so aware of the way that the misjudged decisions of the ruler can lead to the disaster for the whole world of the play.

The disintegration of Lear’s seemingly well-ordered kingdom is spelled out for us in a whole series of scenes in which there is, it seems, no ray of light. Horror is piled on horror, culminating in the blinding of Gloucester. I had heard before I saw the production that Lear bludgeons the Fool to death, and expected it to jar. But it makes sense in this production where the familiar companionship of the Fool has no place. In the same scene the “joint stool” that stands in for Goneril in her mock trial becomes a metal toilet and the bed offered to Lear is a wooden pallet covered in a scruffy blanket.

Around forty extras begin the play as disciplined troops adding to the cold formality of the scene between Lear and his daughters. Later they morph into Lear’s riotous knights, hauling a huge dead stag onto a table in Goneril’s home, I think the only time the natural world is seen onstage. And matching the physical dislocation of many of the main characters they cross the stage, homeless refugees.

Simon Russell Beale in The National Theatre's production, opening 23 JanuarLear’s physical and mental deterioration matches the disintegration of the state. In the first scene, immaculately dressed as a military dictator, Lear is in control, confident enough to allow himself a little chuckle as he puts his disfunctional daughters on the spot. By the time we get to the scenes on the heath he seems to have physically shrunk, shambling across the stage wearing baggy vest and underpants, later in a hospital gown or pyjama bottoms.

Before going to King Lear we made a quick visit to Tate Modern, just along the river. In the surrealist galleries many paintings illustrate a view of the world affected by the world wars of the twentieth century. Among the extrovert pictures by Picasso and  Dali I was drawn to this picture by David Alfaro Siqueiros, entitled Cosmos and Disaster, painted in 1936. He was Mexican working in the USA, and experimented in this painting by thickening his paint with sand, grit and splinters of wood. It is his response to the outbreak of the Spanish Civil War, thought to be influenced by photographs of the trenches of the First World War.

beale Siqueiros Cosmos and DisasterLooking at the scene of desolation and destruction I wondered what King Lear was going to be like. On Siqueiros’s apocalyptic battlefield is nothing but darkness, fractured wood, and wire,  and in the centre of the painting, a small splash of red. Blood, flame, birth, death, suffering? A reminder of the awful cost of war. It made me think of Gloucester’s blood spilled on the stage when he is brutally blinded, all the more shocking because it happens not on the battlefield but in his own home.

There are still a few performances to go before the National Theatre’s production of King Lear closes. It’s a bleak, harsh experience, but if you’ve got the chance, do go. I’ve never before felt that this play is Shakespeare’s greatest achievement – but I did this week.

Share
Posted in Legacy, Plays and Poems, Shakespeare on Stage | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment