Fred J Kormis’s Everyman in Stratford-upon-Avon

Everyman

Everyman

Passing the jewellery shop at the top of Sheep Street in Stratford-upon-Avon, I’ve often wondered about the statue of a young man who looks across the road towards the Town Hall. I had always assumed it must have a Shakespeare connection because pretty well every statue in Stratford does. On the wall of the Town Hall is the 1769 statue of Shakespeare, and on another corner is the Old Bank with its terracotta sculptures of scenes from Shakespeare’s plays and a mosaic based on the church bust.

A few weeks ago I took a better look. The young man in the statue stands behind a shield bearing the Stratford coat of arms. He wears a cloak, tunic, trousers and sandals that could be from almost any period. His expression is unbearably sad, and his clothes are tattered, but there is something noble, even heroic, about his pose. Both the building and the statue are unmistakeably 1960s, but there is no plaque to say what the statue represents or who it is by. Who is he, and why is it so anonymous?

While I can’t say I’ve solved all the mysteries, I now know the statue is called Everyman, the work of the artist Fred J Kormis. I found a great deal of information on the Public Monuments and Sculpture Association website.

Fred J Kormis was born in Frankfurt of Jewish parents in 1887 and died in 1986 in London. As a young man he was apprenticed in a sculptor’s workshop, then at the start of  World War 1 he served in the Austro-Hungarian army, but was captured and spent from 1915 to 1920 in a Siberian war camp. After his release he returned to Frankfurt but when the Nazis came to power he was unable to work and fled to Holland in 1933, then England in 1934 where he anglicised his name from Fritz to Fred. He established his own studio in London but this was destroyed by bombing in 1940.

The Marchers

The Marchers

After the war he became well-known for his bronze medals, with a wide range of subjects including the Duke of Edinburgh, the sculptor Henry Moore, Charlie Chaplin and Winston Churchill. The impact of his experiences as a young man in Siberia and Germany  can be seen in his more serious work such as The Marchers, another wall-sculpture at King’s College on the Strand in London. For many years he planned a Memorial to Prisoners of War and Concentration Camp Victims and by 1967 the work was well advanced. He hoped to install his series of five figures into a building that had been bombed in World War 2, but no suitable site was found and it was placed in Gladstone Park in the London Borough of Brent in 1969. The figures illustrated aspects of his own experience of imprisonment.

The memorial in Gladstone Park

The memorial in Gladstone Park

In 2013 West Hampstead Life reproduced an interview with him from the time:
“First there is the numb shock of realizing you are a prisoner in the hands of the enemy. Then there is the dawning awareness of your predicament and the primitive conditions. The next phase is the thought of escape and freedom. After that many succumb to despair and a sense of hopelessness. Others overcome their dejection and manage to escape.”

The fifth figure in Kormis's series

The fifth figure in Kormis’s series

Kormis had two designs in mind for the fifth and central figure – a figure with outstretched arms, alive and hopeful for the future, or a seated woman, face in hands, sunk in deep grief. “I prefer this but I must admit it is a very sad study. It could be too depressing.” 

From 1944 to his death Kormis lived at 3B Greville Place in north London. The house had been home to Frank Dicksee, a Victorian artist who painted many Shakespeare subjects, most famously Romeo and Juliet. The house was later split into flats, and a Stratford link emerges. His neighbour at 3A was the artist and engraver John Hutton, who created the wall of glass angels in Coventry Cathedral and the glass engravings of Shakespeare characters commissioned for the 1964 Shakespeare Centre in Henley Street. Kormis’s Stratford statue was also put in place in 1964, just at the time when he was making plans for his own tribute to those affected by war.

Close-up of Fred J Kormis's Everyman

Close-up of Fred J Kormis’s Everyman

So maybe there is a Shakespeare connection. The Sheep Street statue has always made me think of the boy in Henry V: a young and unwilling participant in war, to whom Shakespeare gives an individual voice, complaining about those he serves; “As young as I am, I have observed these three swaggerers. I am boy to them all three, but…indeed three such antics do not amount to a man….They would have me as familiar with men’s pockets as their gloves or their handkerchiefs, which makes much against my manhood…. Their villainy goes against my weak stomach”. Although it was the most famous of victories, Shakespeare reports that the boys attached to the English army were all killed during the battle of Agincourt.

The statue makes sense when seen in the context of Fred J Kormis’s other work and his preoccupation with the effects of war on individuals. Everyman surely represents all the young men, from Stratford and every other town, sent to war either never to return, or bearing emotional and physical scars.

PS The owl at the foot of the statue is not a symbol of Athena, or the occult. I believe it is intended to deter pigeons. It is totally ineffective.

Share
Posted in Legacy, Stratford-upon-Avon | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Fred J Kormis’s Everyman in Stratford-upon-Avon

Shakespeare with a twist

Gareth Somers 1616

Gareth Somers 1616

Shakespeare in Stratford isn’t just about the RSC and in fact the town has a number of venues, and several theatre groups, performing a wide range of drama including some by our very own playwright. Sometimes, too, we see plays that put a bit of a twist on Shakespeare and his plays.

One new piece being performed in Stratford at the moment on the subject of Shakespeare’s life. is Gareth Somers’ one-man show 1616: The secrets and passions of William Shakespeare at the Attic Theatre in Stratford from Wednesdays to Sundays until 23 August 2015.

I haven’t seen it myself (yet) but have heard good things about it, and here’s the description from the Attic Theatre website: A poetic and physical one-man performance that sees Shakespeare re-live his own dramatic, grimy, romantic, humorous and poetic life story.

The poet, actor, lover, betrayer, moneylender and ‘king’s man’ conjures a final audience to pick through the ‘rinds and fruits’ of his life.  He revisits the people, passions and politics that formed his life, art and wealth. Turning his acute perception and wit towards his own fears and works  Will wonders if he has any lasting legacy and asks where true value, duty  and love ultimately lie.

Following his one man Woyzeck at Edinburgh 2014 and after playing playwright Christopher Marlowe, Actor Gareth Somers brings the same versatility, skill and energy to play Shakespeare and his old friends and adversaries in a mesmerising performance of this lyrical and enlightening new play.

1616 has a directorial team that Includes Polish Physical Theatre Director Lucyna Hunter and twice award nominated former RSC Actress Kirsten Parker

You can hear a podcast of Gareth Somers talking about it on Radio 4’s Front Row here. There’s information about Gareth Somers and his work here.  This is the link to the Attic Theatre for tickets.  Performances are on Wednesdays, Thursdays, Fridays and Saturdays at 7.30 and on Sundays at 5pm until 23 August.

Poster for R&J

Poster for R&J

This summer I’ve managed to completely miss the Chapel Lane Theatre Company’s performances of Joe Calarco’s R&J that were first performed at the Bear Pit Theatre in London and subsequently transferred to the Tabard Theatre in Chiswick. The play, originally written about twenty years ago, involves the reading of Romeo and Juliet by a group of teenage schoolboys, looking at how their emotions is revealed, and their relationships develop, through reading the play. It’s been widely reviewed and received some great feedback here and here. This new company is proving to be a great addition to Stratford’s active theatre scene so do look out for their next production.

Share
Posted in Shakespeare on Stage, Stratford-upon-Avon | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Shakespeare with a twist

Shakespeare and Samuel Johnson

Joshua Reynolds' painting of Samuel Johnson, at the National Portrait Gallery

Joshua Reynolds’ painting of Samuel Johnson, at the National Portrait Gallery

Today, Monday 10 August 2015 , an exhibition opens at Dr Johnson’s House in London to celebrate the 250th anniversary of Samuel Johnson’s edition of William Shakespeare’s works published in 1765.

In the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography Johnson is described as “arguably the most distinguished man of letters in English history”. He wrote biography, essays, was a moralist and literary critic. He was one of the most noted of lexicographers, with his Dictionary, and editor of Shakespeare’s works. With the assiduous James Boswell accompanying him and writing down his saying, his life is, fortunately, well documented. Boswell’s The Life of Johnson has been hailed as the best biography ever written.

Born in 1709 in the Staffordshire town of Lichfield, Johnson was entranced by Shakespeare from childhood. In the 1740s he planned to make his name by publishing an edition of Shakespeare’s work. Probably put off by the glut of other editions being published at the time, including one by the scholarly Warburton, he shelved the idea and proposed instead compiling a dictionary of the English language as a suitably high-profile project. The Dictionary occupied him from 1747 to 1755 and having with it established a reputation as a serious writer, he returned to the idea of editing Shakespeare. His 1756 Proposals for Printing the Dramatick Works of William Shakespeare was a brilliantly thought-through exposition of what an edition should do. He intended to collate all earlier editions, to trace the sources of Shakespeare’s knowledge and to compare Shakespeare’s with the work of other great poets. His original date of completion was, optimistically, 1757 but it was in October 1765 that The Plays of William Shakespeare, in Eight Volumes, with the Corrections and Illustrations of Various Commentators; to which are added Notes by Sam. Johnson, was published.

Johnson’s work was often delayed. He wrote “Indolence, interruption, business, and pleasure, all take their turns of retardation; and every long work is lengthened by a thousand causes that can, and ten thousand that cannot be recounted. Perhaps no extensive and multifarious performance was ever effected within the term originally fixed in the undertaker’s mind”. Modern editors will appreciate how ambitious was Jonson’s undertaking especially since he intended to carry out much original research.

The title page of the 1765 edition of Shakespeare's Works, edited by Samuel Johnson

The title page of the 1765 edition of Shakespeare’s Works, edited by Samuel Johnson

Johnson’s edition was perhaps not a complete success: he was not a scholar of the Elizabethan period, but he was knowledgeable about the English language. He wrote “I have endeavoured to perform my task with no slight solicitude. Not a single passage in the whole work has appeared to me corrupt, which I have not endeavoured to restore; or obscure, which I have not endeavoured to illustrate. In many I have failed like others; and from many, after all my efforts, I have retreated, and confessed the repulse”.

His preface is still often quoted, and this is one of the best-known sentences: “Shakespeare is above all writers, at least above all modern writers, the poet of nature; the poet that holds up to his readers a faithful mirrour of manners and of life.” In a comment to Joshua Reynolds Johnson admitted that it was writing about literature, rather than editing, that was his real forte. “There are two things which I am confident I can do very well: one is an introduction to any literary work, stating what it is to contain, and how it should be executed in the most perfect manner; the other is a conclusion showing from various causes why the execution has not been equal to what the authour promised to himself and to the public”. The edition was, none the less, received as Boswell put it “with high approbation by the publick”, was reprinted in 1773 and several times subsequently.

The exhibition, entitled Shakespeare in the 18th century: Johnson, Garrick and friends, does more than just celebrate the edition, and I hope to write another post once I’ve had the opportunity of visiting it. From the website, ” The exhibition explores the contributions of Johnson and those in his circle to the treatment of Shakespeare in their day and proudly displays a related selection of prints, portraits and books from the permanent collection of Dr Johnson’s House and several private collections.”

Dr Johnson's House in London

Dr Johnson’s House in London

In addition there are a number of events, beginning on Tuesday 11 August with a guided tour of the house by Fiona Ritchie entitled Women and Shakespeare in the 18th Century, that will explain how Shakespeare was read and popularised by women during the period. On Thursday 13 August there will be a round table discussion by Fiona Ritchie, Professor Robert DeMaria, Katherine Tozer, Professor Philip Smallwood and Professor Peter Sabor, sharing their expert knowledge on topics from collecting the works of Shakespeare to the 18th-century stage. Towards the end of the month performer, director and researcher Mark Howell will present Samuel Johnson & Drury Lane: The Imaginative genius of its Three-Sided Stage. He will talk about his experience of performing popular 18th-century plays at the surviving Georgian Theatre Royal in Richmond.

Most Saturday afternoons there will be Tours of the Exhibition given by the curators, who really know the collection. Though some of the events are being charged for, the Exhibition is free after paying for admission to the house, and will be on until Saturday 28 November.

Share
Posted in Legacy | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Jumping through the hoop: Benedict Cumberbatch’s Hamlet

Benedict Cumberbatch

Benedict Cumberbatch

By the time this post goes live, the latest production of Hamlet to be staged in London will have received its first two performances. I’m writing of course about Benedict Cumberbatch’s Hamlet at the Barbican Theatre.

It was to be expected that comments would appear immediately on social media, and within minutes of the curtain coming down on Wednesday I received a tweet with photo of the curtain call describing it as “playful and electrifying”. By Thursday morning the online versions of The Times and The Mail had published reviews way in advance of the 25 August press night, and this ignoring of convention has created yet more media attention.  Paddy Smith, writing in The Stage Online has described the reviewing of this production on the strength of the first preview as “the first ill-thought step on to the scree slope clearly marked: ‘Danger! Race to the bottom’.”

It was first announced back in September 2013 that the actor, most famous for being Sherlock on TV, was in advanced discussions about playing Hamlet. It was almost another year, August 2014, before tickets went on sale. It became officially the fastest-selling ticket in London theatre history. Apparently all 100,000 tickets sold out within hours, with at one point the online queue reaching over 30,000. The anticipation has even outstripped that for David Tennant’s Hamlet, then playing Doctor Who, at the Courtyard Theatre in Stratford in 2008.

As with Tennant, it would be a mistake to call this merely celebrity casting. Cumberbatch has built a solid career on stage. Patronising remarks have been made about the audience: will the Cumberhordes behave appropriately at the theatre? There was some concern about this with David Tennant too, but audiences were respectful and well-behaved as well as enthusiastic. I saw it three times and never noticed any inappropriate behaviour. Cumberbatch has made a career of playing introverted geniuses so it seems unlikely his admirers will be fazed by Shakespeare, and they won’t want to miss a thing. This article reinforces the point about them.

At the Barbican they are anticipating hysterical fans besieging the stage door, and have written to ticket-holders to tell them that Cumberbatch will not be receiving gifts, nor will he be signing autographs. He will be spirited away through one of the Barbican’s many exits, probably while most members of the audiences are still in the auditorium. There are rumours that tickets are being sold for outrageous amounts online, and efforts are being made to prevent touts. Then there are the stories about the audiences: one lady from rural Wisconsin is leaving the USA for the first time to see Cumberbatch. Will this also, I wonder, be her first experience of Hamlet, or Shakespeare? There’s a lady from Manila in the Philippines who’s expecting it to be a life-changing experience, and a 10-strong group of Japanese fans are coming over in October for this “once-in-a-lifetime opportunity”.

 

The Hamlet 2015 company in rehearsal

The Hamlet 2015 company in rehearsal

Amidst all the hype, let’s not forget that this isn’t a one-man celebrity appearance, but a production of the world’s most famous play. A strong cast has been assembled by the director Lyndsey Turner including Anastasia Hille as Gertrude and Ciaran Hinds as Claudius. In spite of the emphasis on Hamlet himself, the play is a company piece and is always better when there is strong support from other actors.

Cumberbatch seems to be a level-headed man, but how can anybody hope to live up to this level of expectation? Here, the voice of experience, Michael Billington, reassuringly notes that “no actor can fail as Hamlet”. He reminds us that Cumberbatch has had many years of acting in which to acquire the skills for the role, and quotes Max Beerbohm’s description of the role as “a hoop through which every eminent actor must, sooner or later, jump”. But he prefers Oscar Wilde’s statement: “In point of fact there is no such thing as Shakespeare’s Hamlet. If Hamlet has something of the definiteness of a work of art, he also has all the obscurity that belongs to life. There are as many Hamlets as there are melancholies.”

He continues: “We don’t just go to see a star performer: we go to see a play. Elsinore, for instance, is no longer a shadowy backdrop but a crucial part of the experience: in countless productions, including those by Yuri Lyubimov, Richard Eyre and Nicholas Hytner, it has become a network of sinister espionage. ”

One of the advance shots for the Barbican Hamlet 2015. What are we to read into this?

One of the advance shots for the Barbican Hamlet 2015. What are we to read into this?

“Hamlet himself is also increasingly defined by his relationship to the surrounding characters: in recent productions, Patrick Stewart’s shrewdly pragmatic Claudius, Pippa Nixon’s tragically abused Ophelia, Imogen Stubbs’s drink-driven Gertrude have come into just as sharp a focus as the protagonist. I hope that when Lyndsey Turner’s Barbican production is officially unveiled to the press, it will not be judged simply as a test of Cumberbatch’s classical skill: Frankenstein alone proved he had the lungs for the part. It will also, I trust, be seen as a play with a profoundly mysterious hero, who, as Wilde said, has all the obscurity of life.”

The production runs until 31 October, but all is not lost if you don’t have a ticket. Thirty £10 tickets will go on sale every morning, but people are camping out all night for these. So thank goodness for the live relay from the Barbican Theatre to cinemas on 15 October, with Encores following at various dates.

Share
Posted in Shakespeare on Stage | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

The legend of Shakespeare’s crabtree

Shakespeare's Crab, from Charles Frederick Green's pamphlet

Shakespeare’s Crab, from Charles Frederick Green’s pamphlet

I recently wrote about the doggerel rhyme, alleged to have been written by Shakespeare, naming several of the villages near Stratford. The rhyme relates to Shakespeare’s Crab, an old crab-apple tree under which Shakespeare is supposed to have slept, which subsequently acquired magical powers. The legend can be traced back to the mid eighteenth-century, and is referred to by Garrick. The tree, along the main road to Bidford-on-Avon, became a minor shrine and target of souvenir hunters until what was left of it was rooted up in 1824.

After the tree had disappeared it acquired celebrity status. Charles Frederick Green, a Stratford man educated at Shakespeare’s school, published his 50-page account complete with illustrations, Shakespeare’s Crab Tree, around 1857.

The story was repeated in the June 27 1874 issue of All the Year Round, the popular journal founded by Charles Dickens and continued after his death by his son, also named Charles. It quotes directly from Green’s account. There were said to be two groups of drinkers from the Bidford area, the “Topers” and “Sippers”. “The Topers challenged all comers to a drinking match. “Early one Whit-Monday morning William Shakespeare and a few of his right merry boon companions, who had accepted the Topers’ challenge, started for Bidford, and, arriving there, had the mortification to find that the challengers had that very morning gone to Evesham fair on a similar errand; at this disappointment they resolved to take up with the Sippers, who had remained at home… Upon trial, however, the Stratfordians found themselves unequal to the contest, and were obliged to retire whilst they still retained the partial use of their legs. The poet and his comrades had not retreated more than a mile from the famous hostelrie of the Falcon – at which their capabilities had been tested, ere they lay down and bivouacked for the night, under the wide-spreading boughs of a thickly-blossomed crab-tree.”

“Upon waking in the morning Shakespeare’s companions endeavoured to persuade him to renew the contest; but…he declined, and looking round and pointing to the villages from which his adversaries had assembled, uttered the following epigram:
Piping Pebworth, Dancing Marston,
Haunted Hillboro, Hungry Grafton,
Dodging Exhall, Papist Wixford,
Beggarly Broom and Drunken Bidford.
 ”

Perhaps even before Green’s book, the well-known writer Douglas Jerrold had written several verses about the tree. Jerrold, a highly-regarded writer and wit who counted Charles Dickens as a good friend, died in 1857. Towards the end of World War 1 Jerrold’s journalist grandson Walter Jerrold wrote a book called Shakespeare-land that quotes the older Jerrold’s poem. Perhaps intending to coax Americans to visit England (the book was published in both the UK and USA) it contains coloured illustrations by E W Haslehurst. As well as Stratford’s beauty spots there are pictures of “Drunken Bidford”, “Papist Wixford” and “Beggarly Broom”, so powerful was the attraction of the rhyme and its legend.

E W Haslehurst's illustration of Drunken Bidford

E W Haslehurst’s illustration of Drunken Bidford

To Shakespeare’s mighty line
Let’s drink with heart and soul;
‘T will give a zest divine,
Though humble be the bowl.
Then drink while I essay,
In slipshod, careless rhyme,
A legendary lay
Of Willy’s golden time. 

One balmy summer’s night,
As Stratford yeomen tell,
Our will, the royst’ring wight,
Beneath a crab tree fell;
And, sunk in deep repose,
The tipsy time beguiled,
Till Dan Apollo rose
Upon his greatest child. 

Since then all people vowed
The tree had wondrous power:
With sense, with speech endowed,
‘T would prattle by the hour;
Though scattered far about,
Its remnants still would blab:
Mind, ere this fact you doubt, –
It was a female crab. 

“I felt,” thus spoke the tree,
“As down the poet lay,
A touch, a thrill, a glee,
Ne’er felt before that day.
Along my verdant blood
A quick’ning sense did shoot,
Expanding every bud,
And rip’ning all my fruit. 

“What sounds did move the air,
Around me and above!
The yell of mad despair,
The burning sigh of love!
Ambition, guilt-possessed,
Suspicion on the rack,
The ringing laugh and jest,
Begot by sherris-sack!

 Since then, my branches full
Of Shakespeare’s vital heat,
My fruit, once crude and dull
Became, as honey sweet;
And when o’er plain and hill,
E
ach tree was leafless seen,
My boughs did flourish still
In everlasting green.”

 And thus our moral food
Doth Shakespeare leaven still,
Enriching all the good
And less’ning all the ill;-
Thus, by his bounty shed
Like balm from angel’s wing,
Though winter scathe our head,
Our spirits dance with spring”.

Map showing Shakespeare's crab from Green's pamphlet

Map showing Shakespeare’s crab from Green’s pamphlet

The tree received official recognition when the Ordnance Survey map of 1887 marked its position. Today Crabtree Farm is just across the road from where it stood. Until recently Crabtree Garden Centre was next to the farmhouse: it has recently become Bidford-on-Avon Health Centre. The Bidford-on-Avon Wikipedia page claims that a descendant of Shakespeare’s Crab, known locally as Shakespeare’s Tree, still marks the spot. I’m sure that most of those travelling along the B439 (including, until now, me) pass it without any knowledge of this little piece of Shakespeariana.

Postscript: After posting this blog I spotted this entry on the Windows on Warwickshire site relating to a plaster model of Shakespeare asleep under the crab tree contained inside a wooden box. The label reads: ‘Shakespeare Asleep under the Crab Tree – This model was designed by Mr Edw[ard] Grubb of Stratford-upon-Avon, Sculptor, and was given by him to the late Mr Robert Bell Wheler, whose ~ sister, Miss Anne Wheler, gave it to Mr William Oakes Hunt, who, with her concurrence, presented it to the Town of Stratford-upon-Avon, to be ~ preserved in Shakespeare’s House.. 15 July 1861’. Edward Grubb was a well-known local artist and Robert Bell Wheler was a local antiquarian who wrote the first guide to the town as well as a longer book on the History and Antiquities of the town. It is thought to date from the late 1700s, and is now part of the Collections of the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust.

Share
Posted in Legacy, Stratford-upon-Avon | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on The legend of Shakespeare’s crabtree

Talking about race again: playing Iago

Hugh Quarshie and Lucian Msamati

Hugh Quarshie and Lucian Msamati

When Hugh Quarshie’s taking of the role of Othello was first announced, it was this casting that drew the media attention. He had, some decades ago, apparently burned this particular boat by declaring, in print, that Othello should not be played by a black actor. This was not, however, to be the production’s only coup: Lucian Msamati was to play Iago, the first black actor to play the role for a major UK theatre company.  In the last few months, the emphasis has shifted to the performing of this role, easily the longest in the play.

Rory Kinnear as Iago, Adrian Lester as Othello at the National Theatre

Rory Kinnear as Iago, Adrian Lester as Othello at the National Theatre

Recently The Guardian published interviews with three men who have played the role at the National and the RSC. In an article entitled Green-eyed monsters Rory Kinnear, Antony Sher and Richard McCabe all talked about their approach to the role and in particular what they feel makes him tick. For Kinnear it was about jealousy, for Sher a blend of sexual inadequacy and racism, and for McCabe inferiority and sexual jealousy. McCabe also unusually introduced moments of self-doubt into his performance.

Msamati had been asked before about playing Othello, and according to an interview in the Sunday Times on 24 May (not freely available online) he had responded “there is only one role that I am interested in doing [in that play], and that is Iago”. For Msamati, instead of a “holy grail for black actors”, Othello can be “an albatross”. Msamati : “I continue to resent the notion that the height of my ambition or achievement as an actor of a particular persuasion is to one day play the Moor. Umm, excuse me very much!”.

In an online interview published just as the production was opening, Msamati was asked “Why a black Iago?”. He explained: “We did a workshop to explore ideas this summer. It was just about getting actors into a room to see if this will work as a play…. I think the most valuable thing for me was that within a matter of minutes (at) the workshop, it was absolutely clear to everybody that this was going to work.

With both Othello and his trusted second-in-command Iago black, the dynamic changed. From the Sunday Times again: “It opens up so many questions – for starters, blowing up the crusty assumption that a shared skin colour means shared affection. “You don’t even have to go as far back as Hutus versus Tutsis in Rwanda” Quarshie sighs. “It’s been going on for years. ”

Hugh Quarshie as Othello, Lucian Msamati as Iago in the RSC's 2015 Othello

Hugh Quarshie as Othello, Lucian Msamati as Iago in the RSC’s 2015 Othello

And in the Media Diversified interview with Msamati: “[Race] is not an issue at all… And in actual fact, it addresses the character of Iago in a very different way, I think. Because suddenly, it heightens – for me anyway – the sense of betrayal. The sense of broken trust, the sense that you and I – as (Iago) says right at the beginning to Roderigo – we have fought in Rhodes, in Cyprus, on others’ grounds, Christian and heathen, we’ve seen war together, you and I, we are brothers. We’ve done it all together. But you went and chose that guy over me. When the tradition is – he goes on to say to Roderigo – the old tradition was that every second stands heir to the first. If you are the lieutenant, when the general passes over, you automatically take position. But this guy, what does he do? He takes the modern route, he disregards the entire system that has been in place.”

“Regardless of whether Othello’s decision is right or not, it’s the fact that Iago… feels betrayed by that. And that is something which I find has been very, very interesting and challenging as we go through this.”

Both actors feel that they can sympathise with the way Othello is a play about outsiders. Quarshie, in spite of an Oxbridge education and high-profile career on TV, still does not feel part of the mainstream. “You are somewhat marginalised; but also, partly,…after a while you think “Do I really want to be part of their club? And it’s like taking off a pair of shoes that’s been pinching you all day”.

Msamati, anglo-Zimbabwean, feels patronised by the UK’s theatre establishment and is interested in challenging it, suggesting, apparently seriously, that he would like to have a go at Juliet. Neither man sees the production as a gimmick or a politically-correct experiment, but a genuine investigation of the play.

This Sunday, 9 August, you will have the opportunity of hearing the two leading actors, along with Onyeka (historian, writer and lecturer) and Celia R Caputi (writer and Professor of English at Florida State University) discuss whether Othello can be considered a racist play. The debate is to be held at the Royal Shakespeare Theatre in Stratford-upon-Avon at 11am, and will look at the current production as well as examining the broader issue of what a contemporary interpretation of the play actually means. The production itself runs until 28 August 2015. If you’re not able to catch it onstage, it will be live streamed to cinemas on 26 August.

Share
Posted in Shakespeare on Stage | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Ben Jonson, Shakespeare and Burbage: Volpone on stage

Henry Goodman as Volpone

Henry Goodman as Volpone

When Ben Jonson delivered his new comedy Volpone to the King’s Men in early 1606, Richard Burbage must have cheered. Jonson would have written the leading role with Burbage in mind, as Shakespeare also wrote roles for his most popular and talented actor. But Shakespeare had been producing tragedies like King Lear and Timon of Athens, and those odd comedies Measure for Measure and All’s Well That Ends Well. Lear is certainly one of the greatest roles in English drama, but for an actor of the skills of Burbage, in particular with the ability to engage an audience directly, the greedy, calculating, disguise-loving Volpone must have been a great gift.

This only occurred to me recently, after seeing Henry Goodman play the role in Trevor Nunn’s RSC production. I’ve never seen the title role acted with such energy and flair. It’s usually Mosca, the endlessly inventive servant, who overshadows Volpone particularly where his master is reduced to lying almost motionless in bed. Volpone himself is rarely attractive, but Goodman suavely charms his audience from the moment we first see him.

Orion Lee as Mosca, Matthew Kelly as Corvino, Henry Goodman as Volpone

Orion Lee as Mosca, Matthew Kelly as Corvino, Henry Goodman as Volpone

Having spent much of the first part of the play prone in bed, Volpone suddenly has the chance to be outrageously funny in the mountebank scene, and Goodman grasps this opportunity, as, we can imagine, Burbage did, turning into a market-trader to sell his miracle health-oil with much banter and singing. In past productions I’ve found this scene tedious, but thinking of it as the opportunity for the greatest actor of his generation to show off, it makes sense.

This makes it even more of a shock when in the scene with Celia, with whom he claims to have fallen in love, he shackles her to the bed and threatens her with rape. It’s a step you feel Shakespeare would not have taken: our liking for Volpone suddenly evaporates, replaced by feelings of doubt. It made me think of Marina’s plight in Shakespeare’s Pericles, written a few years later, when faced with being raped, Marina is given the words to talk herself out of her dangerous situation. This and the scene where she tells Pericles her story, are some of the most powerful Shakespeare ever wrote, but here Celia has to be rescued by the clumsy device of a virtuous young man appearing on stage and whisking her away from Volpone.

In the talkback that took place after the performance on Tuesday evening many of the questions, and the resulting discussion, centred on the “rape scene”. Rhiannon Handy, playing Celia, had been uncertain how to play it: surely she should put up a fight? The actors had already explained that Trevor Nunn justified everything through the text, and in this case he had insisted that unlike some of Shakespeare’s spunky heroines, Celia has been abused to the extent that she has little fight left in her. Just before this scene, her husband, hoping to be the inheritor of Volpone’s wealth, threatens her with violence to make her agree to stay alone with him.
I will drag thee hence home, by the haire;
Cry thee a strumpet, through the streetes; rip up
Thy mouth, unto thine eares; and slit thy nose.

After the rape scene the audience may agree that Volpone deserves the punishment meted out to him, but Volpone, or the actor playing him, has the last word. In the epilogue we can imagine Richard Burbage, the audience’s favourite, speaking as himself:
The seasoning of a play is the applause.
Now, though the Foxe be punish’d by the laws,
He, yet, doth hope there is no suffring due,
For any fact, which he hath done ‘gainst you;
It there be, censure him: here he, doubtfull, stands.
If not, fare Jovially, and clap your hands. 

Rhiannon Handy as Celia, Henry Goodman as Volpone

Rhiannon Handy as Celia, Henry Goodman as Volpone

Another question at the talkback was an observation that Volpone seemed uncertain during the rape scene. Was Goodman implying that Volpone had doubts about raping Celia? Well, no. The bed, intended to come up through the trap from below the stage, had stuck, and Goodman had had to fill in. What the perceptive member of the audience had detected was “chaos and fear”. The audience, Goodman noted, would always seek for meaning, even when there was none.

There would have been no such problems on the early modern stage as beds must have arrived by more straightforward routes. If you’re intrigued by the significance and staging of bedroom scenes in Elizabethan and Jacobean drama, you could go to the Research in Action event at the Sam Wanamaker Playhouse, Shakespeare’s Globe, in London on Thursday 6 August. Entitled Beds and Bedroom Scenes, Dr Will Tosh and Elizabeth Sharrett will explore how playwrights exploited the intimacy of the indoor playhouse to highlight moments of seduction and delight, sexual violence and sexualised murder.  Actors will play out scenes from Beaumont and Fletcher’s The Maid’s Tragedy, John Ford’s Tis Pity She’s a Whore and James Shirley’s Love’s Cruelty, under the direction of James Wallace.

The RSC’s production of Volpone, is on at the Swan Theatre in Stratford-upon-Avon until 12 September 2015. Sadly it is not one of the RSC shows that is to be live streamed to cinemas.

All photos of the RSC’s production are by Manuel Harlan and copyright of the RSC

Share
Posted in Shakespeare's World | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Ben Jonson, Shakespeare and Burbage: Volpone on stage

Bidford-on-Avon and the Shakespeare legend

Back in June 2015 a farm vehicle struck the fifteenth-century stone bridge at Bidford-on-Avon, a few miles downstream from Stratford. Bidford was once, as Stratford still is, a market town and its bridge marks a crossing that goes back to Roman times. During the Civil War it was partially demolished by Royalist troops retreating from Worcester to Oxford. More recently it’s been damaged by flood waters, but this time “significant damage to the… stone parapet, spandrel wall and central pier”, means the bridge will be closed to motor traffic for some months, though pedestrians and cyclists are able to use it.

Bidford-on-Avon bridge

Bidford-on-Avon bridge

The narrow bridge is governed by traffic lights to make it one way, while people on foot cross carefully taking shelter in the refuges on the side. In Stratford, Sir Hugh Clopton’s bridge of the same age has always been grander, and has been enlarged over the years: it still carries much of the through traffic including enormous lorries though there are currently discussions going on about restricting traffic using it. Bidford’s little bridge always feels like a relic of a quieter past.

It’s a town with Shakespearian connections, mentioned in a piece of doggerel verse that is reputed to have been written by Shakespeare himself.
Piping Pebworth, Dancing Marston,
Haunted Hillboro, Hungry Grafton,
Dodging Exhall, Papist Wixford,
Beggarly Broom and Drunken Bidford.

A print of Hillborough Manor from 1943

A print of Hillborough Manor from 1943

The villages mentioned in the rhyme: Pebworth, Long or Broad Marston, Hillborough, Temple or Arden’s Grafton, Exhall, Wixford, Broom and Bidford, are all situated to the west of Stratford, roughly in a triangle formed by Stratford, Alcester and Evesham. It’s not certain whether the villages ever merited their descriptions, but Papist Wixford could be a reference to the Catholic Throckmorton family, and the tiny hamlet of Hillborough contained an ancient manor house that might have been reputed to be haunted.

Bidford, the only place of any size, could well have been described as drunken. It had and still has several licensed premises, though the one in which it is reputed Shakespeare drank, the Falcon Inn, is now flats, still containing some sixteenth-century features. Bidford held markets, where farmers and those who came to buy and sell would need refreshment and maybe accommodation, and the river at Bidford, as in Stratford, was a working river, though little remains now. Gradually as Stratford became larger and busier, Bidford’s market declined. This article published in the Birmingham Post by Chris Upton gives lots of details.

Bidford’s reputation as a good place to go for a drink was undoubtedly promoted by the local innkeepers, and the connection with Shakespeare wouldn’t have done them any harm either. The rhyme quoted earlier relates to a drinking match in which Shakespeare is said to have taken part with other local lads, and the crab-apple tree under which he is said to have slept it off. I’m going to look at the legend of Shakespeare’s Crab in a later post, but I’ve been searching around to try to establish where the legend and the rhyme might have come from.

The fullest account comes in Samuel Schoenbaum’s book Shakespeare’s Lives (1970), which he wrote as a preliminary volume to his larger book William Shakespeare: a Documentary Life (1974). In it he investigated the myths and legends of Shakespeare’s life, bringing some much-needed clarity to a subject complicated by the sheer number of forged and semi-fictional accounts.

The Falcon Inn, Bidford, from a postcard

The Falcon Inn, Bidford, from a postcard

Schoenbaum finds that Sir Hugh Clopton, the eighteenth-century owner of New Place, told the story to the local schoolmaster Joseph Greene. Greene mentioned in a letter dated 1758 that he did not believe it. Then “an anonymous traveller, writing in The British Magazine in 1762 tells of putting up at the White Lion in Stratford, and being taken by the landlord to the village of Bidford, about seven miles below Stratford”. A version of the story was told by the notoriously unreliable John Jordan, who collected and elaborated many of the anecdotes relating to Shakespeare, but Jordan did not invent any major part of the story. Instead it seems to have been promoted by landlords both in Stratford and Bidford. Schoenbaum again: “A scene for the revelry would be found in a large building at Bidford once called the Falcon Inn; not only would the room be pointed out to admiring callers, but also the actual chair in which Shakespeare sat”.

One of the accounts of the drinking story, from The Gentleman’s Magazine in 1794, is available online. In it the author comments that “Shakespeare’s bench, and the half-pint mug out of which he used to take very copious draughts of ale at a public house either in Stratford-upon-Avon, or the neighbourhood of the town, are well-known to all our English Antiquaries”. All these spurious relics, like “Shakespeare’s chair” at the Birthplace “are melted into air, into thin air”, leaving not a rack behind”. Yet the legends that surround them are some of the most enduring stories about Shakespeare’s life.

 

Share
Posted in Legacy, Shakespeare's World, Stratford-upon-Avon | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Alas, poor Yorick: the spell of Hamlet

The title page of the Hamlet First Quarto

The title page of the Hamlet First Quarto

On 26 July 1602 Shakespeare’s play Hamlet was registered with the Stationers’ Company in London. It’s an important date, but has done little to settle the burning question of when Shakespeare’s most famous play was first written and first performed. The Stationers’ Register sets out the details: “James Robertes. Entred for his Copie under the handes of master Pasfield and master Waterson warden A booke called the Revenge of Hamlett Prince Denmarke as yt was latelie Acted by the Lord Chamberleyne his servantes”.

Books had to be registered with the Stationers’ Company before they could be printed, but entry didn’t guarantee this would happen. Sometimes books were entered just to stop anyone else publishing first. This time something went wrong. In 1603 the play appeared in print without any reference to James Roberts. It’s assumed that there was such a demand for Shakespeare’s brilliant play that a publisher got a bootleg copy out quickly. This so-called “bad quarto” was intended to satisfy those who had seen it performed. The title page claimed “As it hath beene diverse times acted by his Highnesse servants in the Cittie of London: as also in the two Universities of Cambridge and Oxford, and else-where”. It’s the one that includes the lines “To be, or not to be, I there’s the point./To die, to sleepe, is that all? I all”. Only two copies survive, the first being discovered as late as 1823.

The comparison between the 1603 “bad quarto”, the 1604 “good quarto” and the 1623 Folio has challenged scholars ever since. The 1604 quarto appeared, printed by James Roberts who had registered the play two years earlier, but without the information about the performances outside London. Those early audiences had no way of reminding ourselves of the hundreds of quotable lines and phrases it contains, other than to go ad see it again. Hamlet is often said to be a play made up of quotations. The British Library’s Treasures in Full contains an article covering the whole subject.

Many people have undertaken detective work to date the play and Gabriel Harvey’s note in a book published in 1598 provides a clue. He wrote “The Earle of Essex much commendes Albions England…The younger sort takes much delight in Shakespeares Venus & Adonis: but his Lucrece & his tragedie of Hamlet, Prince of Denmarke, have it in them, to please the wiser sort”. With the Earl of Essex being executed in February 1601 this means that the play was being performed in 1600, and it would be more than four years before a reliable text would be made available.

David Tennant as Hamlet, RSC 2008, with the skull used by Edmund Kean

David Tennant as Hamlet, RSC 2008, with the skull used by Edmund Kean

Every performance of Hamlet requires probably the most famous theatrical prop of all, a human skull. Modern productions are able to use one made of a material such as fibre glass, but for centuries there was no alternative to a real one. The RSC Collection contains the skull used by the great actor Edmund Kean in 1814. In 2008 this object, that had lain quietly in a box in a museum store for probably a hundred years, made an unexpected reappearance, not just on stage but in the photographs of the RSC’s production. It’s a wonderful if unintentional example of the continuity of Shakespeare in performance.

It wasn’t meant to be like this: David Tennant was the first Hamlet the RSC had engaged who was happy with the idea of using the skull of a man whose dying wish was to appear onstage as Yorick. Gregory Doran, directing the production, published his diary entry for 26 July 2008, an early preview. His entertaining account of this bizarre story was published in his 2009 book The Shakespeare Almanac. Doran clearly appreciated the Shakespearean resonances raised by events, and I hope he will not mind me quoting part of it.

“In 1980* [sic], William Lockwood, the head of properties at the RSC, received a very strange parcel. It was a human skull. It belonged to Andre Tchaikowski, a pianist and composer, who had died of cancer in Oxford aged 46. He had bequeathed his skull in his will to the company to be used in a production of Hamlet, as Yorick. Apparently, the funeral directors handling Andre’s cremation had baulked at removing his head, and permission had to be sought from the Home Office. The head was removed and processed by medical staff at the hospital, but by the time William Lockwood received it, it still stank… And so far it has never been used. Roger Rees was painted for the poster of the 1984 production holding this skull, and Mark Rylance had used it in rehearsal in 1989, but Andre had never actually got on stage in performance. Tonight was to be his night”.

The reason why the skull was not used for the first performances, and a substitute had to be found at short notice, was that the special license required to go ahead had not been received. There was no such problem with the skull Kean had used, so this one was back in the spotlight again. The official license was received shortly afterwards and Andre’s skull was used for both the Stratford and London runs. His wish had been granted.

*Tchaikowski died in 1982.

Share
Posted in Legacy, Shakespeare on Stage | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Shakespeare: fighting history

The Boyhood of Raleigh, by Millais

The Boyhood of Raleigh, by Millais

This summer Tate Britain is mounting an exhibition entitled Fighting History, on the subject of history painting, a rather unfashionable and neglected genre.   From Ancient Rome to recent political upheavals, Fighting History looks at how artists have transformed significant events into paintings and artworks that encourage us to reflect on our own place in history.

From the epic 18th century history paintings…to contemporary pieces … the exhibition explores how artists have reacted to key historic events, and how they capture and interpret the past. Often vast in scale, history paintings engage with important narratives from the past, from scripture and from current affairs. Some scenes protest against state oppression, while others move the viewer with heroic acts, tragic deaths and the plights of individuals swept up in events beyond their control. 

History painting had been regarded as the most prestigious branch of painting for hundreds of years before it became really popular in England in the late eighteenth century. The interpretation of real events like Benjamin West’s The Death of General Wolfe were perhaps the most important, but painters also depicted events from the more distant past, or imaginary events. The Victorian painter William Frederick Yeames painted the famous painting set during the English Civil War And When Did You Last See your Father? as well as The Death of Amy Robsart, that questions the mysterious death of Robert Dudley’s wife during Queen Elizabeth’s reign.

Inevitably, given the need for dramatic subjects, Shakespeare’s plays have often been the inspiration for English history painters. The Boydell Shakespeare Gallery was the largest and most ambitious project in which one hundred and sixty-seven paintings were created by thirty-three artists between 1791 and 1805, from which prints and an edition of Shakespeare’s works were also made for sale. In the introduction to Pape and Burwick’s book The Boydell Shakespeare Gallery, Burwick calls theatre painting “a genre in the process of defining itself”. Artists were allowed the freedom to decide what aspect of the play they wanted to focus on. Some of the paintings depict moments only described, or that must have happened, such as Northcote’s paintings of the killing of the little princes in the tower in Richard III. Burwick notes that Henry Fuseli “was undoubtedly the most bold in his experimentation, frequently choosing to represent the mental psychodrama rather than anything that might possibly be realized on stage”. Rather than looking for off-stage moments, as Northcote had done, Fuseli “sought out scenes which would allow him visually to externalize subjective experience”.

Fuseli's painting of Henry V, Royal Shakespeare Company Collection; Supplied by The Public Catalogue Foundation

Fuseli’s painting of Henry V, Royal Shakespeare Company Collection; Supplied by The Public Catalogue Foundation

For instance in Henry V, Fuseli chose to depict the revelation of the conspiracy of Henry’s friends at Southampton: “Hal’s growth as wise and capable monarch comes into its final maturation in this scene”, and Fuseli captures the essence of the scene and of the play with its emphasis on the monarchy’s role in the nation. The Chorus reminds us why it is significant:
O England! model to thy inward greatness,
Like little body with a mighty heart,
What mightst thou do , that honour would thee do,
Were all thy children kind and natural!

Fighting History has received a number of unfavourable reviews from the newspapers, including The Guardian and the Telegraph. Spear’s found it “disappointing and baffling”, at least partly because the exhibition refuses to define what it means by history painting. The Arts Desk impatiently tells us: “it is surely quite easy to define. Didactic and preoccupied with grand narrative, showcasing the accomplishment and learning of the artist, it expounds themes from classical history or the Bible or immortalises pivotal, historically significant moments from the more recent past”.

Henry Wallis's painting The Room in which Shakespeare was Born

Henry Wallis’s painting The Room in which Shakespeare was Born

There’s not much room here for Fuseli’s psychological paintings of Shakespeare. I haven’t been to the exhibition but from the descriptions, theatre paintings seem to be have been excluded. Strangely, though, the exhibition does include one painting that has Shakespeare relevance. It’s Henry Wallis’s The Room in Which Shakespeare was Born, from 1853, that I happened to write about in May. The Arts Desk complains that with no “grand narrative” this is “miscast as history painting”. The FT disagrees, enjoying the way that history paintings can be “coded political comment”, (just as plays, especially Shakespeare’s plays, are and were), and congratulating the exhibition’s curators for including “peaceful scenes such as Henry Wallis’s serene [painting of the birthroom]” rather than solely the “pivotal, historically significant moments”.

For Culture 24 the aim of the exhibition is to “celebrate the emotional power of history painting and show its persistent place in art”. You’ve got until 13 September 2015 to see for yourself if it has succeeded.

Share
Posted in Legacy | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Shakespeare: fighting history